Searched hist:"86 b27beae59685a42f81bcda9d502b5aebddfab8" (Results 1 – 1 of 1) sorted by relevance
| /linux/mm/ |
| H A D | memory_hotplug.c | diff 86b27beae59685a42f81bcda9d502b5aebddfab8 Sat Oct 27 00:07:38 CEST 2018 Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> mm/memory_hotplug.c: clean up node_states_check_changes_offline()
This patch, as the previous one, gets rid of the wrong if statements.
While at it, I realized that the comments are sometimes very confusing,
to say the least, and wrong.
For example:
___
zone_last = ZONE_MOVABLE;
/*
* check whether node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY] will be changed
* If we try to offline the last present @nr_pages from the node,
* we can determind we will need to clear the node from
* node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY].
*/
for (; zt <= zone_last; zt++)
present_pages += pgdat->node_zones[zt].present_pages;
if (nr_pages >= present_pages)
arg->status_change_nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
else
arg->status_change_nid = -1;
___
In case the node gets empry, it must be removed from N_MEMORY. We already
check N_HIGH_MEMORY a bit above within the CONFIG_HIGHMEM ifdef code. Not
to say that status_change_nid is for N_MEMORY, and not for N_HIGH_MEMORY.
So I re-wrote some of the comments to what I think is better.
[osalvador@suse.de: address feedback from Pavel]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180921132634.10103-5-osalvador@techadventures.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180919100819.25518-6-osalvador@techadventures.net
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|